JUMLAH KOLONI DAN DAYA HAMBAT YOGHURT CAMPURAN Streptococcus thermophilus DAN Lactobacillus acidophilus TERHADAP Propionibacterium acnes

  • Eka Noneng Nawangsih Departemen Mikrobiologi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Lina Damayanti Departemen Kulit dan Kelamin, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Ikhnar Winura Putra Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani, Cimahi, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Abstract

Probiotik merupakan organisme hidup yang mampu memberikan efek yang menguntungkan kesehatan apabila dikonsumsi dalam jumlah yang cukup. Yoghurt yang mengandung Lactobacillus acidophilus dan Streptococcus thermophilus memiliki kemampuan antibakteri. L. acidophilus dan S. thermophilus dapat menghasilkan senyawa antibakteri yaitu bakteriosin, asam laktat, dan H2O2. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui jumlah koloni bakteri pada yoghurt dan menguji daya hambat yoghurt campuran L. acidophilus dan S. thermophilus terhadap P. acnes. Rancangan penelitian ini adalah eksperimental laboratorik dengan metode post-test only control group design. Objek penelitiannya adalah yoghurt yang difermentasi dengan L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 dan S. thermophilus FNCC 19258, P. acnes ATCC 11827 yang dibiakkan pada media Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA), klindamisin 10 µg/ml sebagai kontrol positif, dan akuades sebagai kontrol negatif. Hasil penghitungan TPC pada pengulangan pertama 30 x 1014 CFU/ml dan pengulangan kedua 18 x 1014 CFU/ml. Jumlah ini memenuhi kriteria SNI jumlah bakteri probiotik pada yoghurt, yaitu ≥107 CFU/ml. Hasil penelitian daya hambat menunjukkan terbentuknya daya hambat di sekitar disk yoghurt dan klindamisin yang kemudian diukur menggunakan jangka sorong. Rerata daya hambat yoghurt (K1) 11,87± 0,76; Klindamisin (K+) 25,00±0,00 dan akuades (K-) tidak menunjukkan adanya daya hambat. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan statistik dengan menggunakan uji Kruskall Wallis diperoleh nilai p sebesar 0,02 (<0,05). Hal ini menunjukkan adanya perbedaan rerata diameter hambat antara yoghurt, klindamisin, dan akuades. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah jumlah koloni bakteri probiotik pada yoghurt memenuhi SNI dan dapat menghambat pertumbuhan P. acnes secara signifikan.


 


Kata kunci: daya hambat, koloni, L. acidophilus, P. acnes, S. thermophilus, yoghurt


DOI : 10.35990/mk.v8n0.p80-89

References

1. Zaenglein AL, Pathy AL, Schlosser BJ, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(5):945–73.e33
2. Nast A, Dreno B, Bettoli V, et al. European evidence-based (S3) guideline for the treatment of acne—update 2016. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(8):1261-8
3. Del Rosso JQ, Leyden JJ. Topical antibiotics in the management of acne vulgaris: issues, concerns, and the role of combination therapy. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2013;6(2):20-4.
4. Dreno B, Thiboutot D, Layton AM, et al. Large-scale worldwide observational study of adherence with acne therapy. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59(9)
5. Katzung BG, Trevor AJ. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. 15th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2020.
6. Liu M, Li S, Guo H, et al. Effects of Streptococcus thermophilus on ceramide production in human skin and its role in acne treatment. J Dermatol Sci. 2018;92(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2018.02.003.
7. Appas A, Slade H, Schaefer A, et al. Phytosphingosine and its role in acne management: A review of recent studies. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2021;34(4):233-40. doi: 10.1159/000516042
8. Kang JH, Choi EH, Kim SY, et al. Topical application of Lactobacillus for the management of acne vulgaris: a review of clinical evidence. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(1):123-9. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13077.
9. Walstra P, Geurts TJ, Plas van der SM, et al. Dairy Technology: Principles of Milk Properties and Processes. 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press; 2006.
10. O'Sullivan J, Lucey JA. Fermentation and yoghurt-making processes. In: Handbook of Food Science, Technology, and Engineering. CRC Press; 2019. p. 1-27
11. Santos L, Malcata FX. Methods for counting bacterial colonies. In: Handbook of Food Microbiology. CRC Press; 2016. p. 1-12.
12. Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN). SNI 7552:2009. Minuman Susu Fermentasi. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional; 2009.
13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2020.
14. Murray PR, Rosenthal KS, Pfaller MA. Medical Microbiology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020.
15. Gänzle MG. Lactic acid bacteria as antimicrobials in food production. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2015;14(2):1-16. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12188.
16. de Souza BM, da Silva AL, da Silva Ventura TM, et al. Antimicrobial compounds produced by Lactobacillus spp.: An overview. Microb Pathog. 2019;130:132-45. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.02.038.
17. Gänzle MG. Lactic acid bacteria as antimicrobials in food production. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2015;14(2):1-16. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12188.
18. Rattanachaikunsopon P, Phumkhachorn P. Lactic acid bacteria: Their antimicrobial compounds and their uses in food production. Ann Biol Res. 2010;1(4):218-28.
19. Diez-Gutiérrez L, San Vicente L, Jaime I, et al. Effectiveness of lactic acid bacteria producing organic acids, bacteriocins, or both to reduce foodborne pathogens and extend the shelf life of packed meat products. Food Microbiol. 2020;92:103553. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103553.
20. Gänzle MG, Feng J, Zhang H, et al. Lactic acid bacteria: The role of lactic acid and other organic acids in the antimicrobial effects of probiotics. Microb Biotechnol. 2020;13(4):1204-19. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13513.
21. Katsivela E, Schlegel M, Arvanitoyannis IS. The effect of different antimicrobial agents on the enzymatic activity and microbial growth in fermented foods. J Food Sci. 2014;79(12). doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12773.
22. Borges A, Pereira C, Saavedra MJ, et al. Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of action of hydrogen peroxide. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;118(6):1436-44. doi: 10.1111/jam.12878.
23. Manzoni M, Spadoni I, Pizzoferrato L, et al. The effect of hydrogen peroxide on the oxidative stress and cell membrane of pathogenic bacteria. J Food Sci. 2016;81(5). doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13265.
24. Pessione E, Cirrincione S, Kasanen H, et al. Antimicrobial compounds produced by lactic acid bacteria: An overview. Food Control. 2019;102:309-21. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.03.029.
25. Coda R, Rizzello CG, De Angelis M, et al. Production of reuterin and its impact on the microbial population of fermented foods. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127(4):1044-56. doi: 10.1111/jam.14279.
26. Folsom JP, Naczi J, Wang T, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial properties and mechanisms of action of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;121(5):1488-98. doi: 10.1111/jam.13365.
Published
2025-06-25
How to Cite
NAWANGSIH, Eka Noneng; DAMAYANTI, Lina; PUTRA, Ikhnar Winura. JUMLAH KOLONI DAN DAYA HAMBAT YOGHURT CAMPURAN Streptococcus thermophilus DAN Lactobacillus acidophilus TERHADAP Propionibacterium acnes. Medika Kartika : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan, [S.l.], p. 80-89, june 2025. ISSN 2655-6537. Available at: <http://medikakartika.unjani.ac.id/medikakartika/index.php/mk/article/view/1314>. Date accessed: 29 june 2025.